Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoulPage IT Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:24, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SoulPage IT Solutions[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources provided at the bottom of the article are mere listings and do not constitute WP:SIGCOV. I've found another article with somewhat more coverage (this) but I'm not sure this is sigcov either. Having done a search, some other articles with brief mentions are available. Overall, I believe WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY is not met. Modussiccandi (talk) 12:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 12:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 12:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 12:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as fails NCORPDEPTH. The money control article does not qualify as significant source.Faizal batliwala (talk) 13:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination, sole claim to notability per WP:CORP is being one of five startups to be shortlisted for a potentially significant national project. No prejudice against re-creation if they win the competitive tender and are catapulted to fame, fortune and WP:SIGCOV. Captain Calm (talk) 13:57, 9 November 2020 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:44, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination does not meet notability requirements.VViking_TalkEdits 15:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.