Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorrowful God

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and redirect to Marija Gimbutas. Randykitty (talk) 10:12, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorrowful God[edit]

Sorrowful God (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence such thing exists in polish mythology -No.Altenmann >t 05:16, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification: This verision was nominated for deletion, not the current text about ideas of Gimbutas. -No.Altenmann >t 06:39, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment This is some notion of Marija Gimbutas (see [1]), but I don't know offhand whether it has any traction, and I don't know how Poland has anything to do with this, since we're talking neolithic era speculations. Mangoe (talk) 13:17, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Marija Gimbutas as a plausible search term. The article states clearly that this is a modern neologism that originated with Gimbutas, but I guess the question is whether or not it is notable enough for a stand-alone article. I don't think so. A very brief reference to it is cited by Thorkild Jacobsen in a book edited by Richard S. Hess and David Toshio Tsumura[2] and other academic sources (e.g. Miriam Robbins Dexter[3], Vassos Karageorghis[4], Anthropological Quarterly[5], proceedings of a Thracology conference [6]). There appears to be reference to it in The Journal of Prehistoric Religion[7], which appears to be an academic source(see [8]) but I can't say for sure. Incidentally, there is a reference to this in Pensive Christ. Hamangia culture does not currently mention it, but it appears to be connected. (Disclosure: I am responding due to a notice placed on WP:FTN.) - Location (talk) 16:40, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect this should have been nipped in the bud five years ago. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:46, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per above. And though it's not reason to delete in itself, that this doesn't have an article on plwiki does suggest this isn't just a linguistic issue on enwiki. --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - There doesn't seem to be significant coverage in reliable sources. I question the value of a redir, but don't object if that is the consensus. - - MrBill3 (talk) 02:48, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.