Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorani Wikipedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 09:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorani Wikipedia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable version of Wikipedia: the article either includes only non-independent and self-published sources (especially Wikipedia itself), or has no sources at all. (Contested PROD). eh bien mon prince (talk) 11:21, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment can't you just redirect this to List of Wikipedias or something? Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:59, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting an article without discussion would be kind of tyrannical, I think.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:16, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep under the policy of WP:IGNOREALLRULES, we need to document our own history. Carrite (talk) 17:22, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If its only purpose is to document the history of Wikipedia, it should not be in mainspace.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:17, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Wikipedias. It's not notable but should not be outright deleted. Jguy _Talk^Done 17:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Jguy. Ansh666 01:50, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.