Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Clarke (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sophie Clarke[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been famous (not notable) for one occasion. The article was discussed and decided to redirect, in 2012, to that one-time occasion. It has been re-created by a blocked editor without much addition and has no real development since. I see no reason to keep this bio article in WP. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 09:11, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep, seems notable and well-sourced. Frietjes (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:01, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:01, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:01, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Survivor: South Pacific, absolutely no other claim of notability, clear example of ONEEVENT. J04n(talk page) 23:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, article was redirected and has since been improved and sourced. Very clearly meets WP:GNG. Gloss • talk 18:17, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also to note, this is more-so the 3rd nomination, as it was nominated in a group of articles at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise Stapley with a result to keep (less than 3 months ago). Gloss • talk 18:21, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:37, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Meets WP:GNG as every American survivor winner has done apparently. Even a number of non-winners are apparently notable. Which is why we have a template like this:

--Milowent • ^hasspoken 19:56, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.