Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Fracassi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Fracassi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable musician with no significant Tier1 coverage. Fails WP:GNG, WP:SINGER Sonofstar (talk) 17:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sonofstar (talk) 17:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sonofstar (talk) 17:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Sonofstar (talk) 17:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I was about sending this to AFD myself. This is the archetypal case of TOOSOON Celestina007 (talk) 17:48, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:51, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sources given are obviously paid promotion.--- Possibly (talk) 18:07, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet notability. Lesliechin1 (talk) 18:51, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG, maybe someday but for now TOOSOON JW 1961^Talk 20:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:TOOSOON, currently fails WP:MUSICBIO. I'm seeing lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. --Ashley yoursmile! 06:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Musicians are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their music technically metaverifies its own existence on Spotify — she has to actually pass a criterion in WP:NMUSIC, and she actually has to have reliable source coverage in media about those accomplishments, to clear the bar. But the four "press" links are blogs, not reliable or notability-making publications. I wish her good luck building her career, and obviously an article can be recreated about her if and when she's achieved something more noteworthy than just the existence of a song — but right now is WP:TOOSOON. We are not a free public relations platform for aspiring future stars to publicize themselves in advance of actually accomplishing anything noteworthy. Bearcat (talk) 16:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG & SINGER. TheDreamBoat (talk) 14:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No RS helping this subject to meet GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. Fails the latter miserably. --Kbabej (talk) 23:30, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.