Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sopa de agnollini
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sopa de agnollini[edit]
- Sopa de agnollini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete non notable soup recipe, both for lack of notability, and because wikipedia is not a recipe book Mayalld (talk) 21:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Brazilian Cuisine which has relevant sections. While it doesn't seem wildly notable, a handful of Google hits verify its existence [1]. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 21:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Change to delete - I was thinking "no harm done", but re-Googling in the light of ArchonMagnus's comment, considering the possibility of misspelling, it looks majorly non-notable in its lack of mention even in Brazilian sources. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 20:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable soup. Possible redirect per Gordonofcartoon. Matt (Talk) 23:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don't think this is notable enough and (at present) shouldn't be included in WP. I may reconsider should there be a significant increase in the article content relaying any sense of notability. Per Gordon's comment: while Google hits relay a bit of information, they alone cannot be used to establish notability. —Archon Magnus(Talk | Home) 19:57, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.