Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonyaa Ayodhya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:51, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sonyaa Ayodhya[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actor who does not meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. She has had one recurring role in Nazar, but nothing indicates that it was a major role, and that doesn't come close to notability requirements for an actor. The sources are press releases (including at least one PR that's used as two different sources) and gossip magazines. There has been a number of attempts to create Wikipedia articles about this individual before, by a number of paid accounts (see deletion logs for Sonyaa and Sonyaa Pink, and the current article was created as a draft and then moved to mainspace by another account who was later blocked as a sock of the first one. This is a person who really wants to use Wikipedia as a promotional platform, and although the current article is not overly promotional, she does not meet any notability requirements. bonadea contributions talk 15:56, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 15:56, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 15:56, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

*KEEP - I read it, Sources establish notability it mets WP:ICTFSOURCES and WP:GNG yes information in article is not enough need to find more resources and information for article you can put NOTABILITY tag instead of deleting it. I vote to KEEP. Krishna Murthy DL (talk) 10:29, 3 June 2020 (UTC) Sock puppet comment struck. --bonadea contributions talk 15:58, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But none of the sources meets WP:ICTFSOURCES and there is certainly no WP:SIGCOV – so how do you reckon WP:GNG is met? --bonadea contributions talk 11:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea: The reference No. 2,3,4,5,6 are very reliable in india, specifically 2, 3 are from Times Group which is well know groups and very authentic references. As I said above Yes article lacks a information but not doing advertising Sonyaa Ayodhya is a known (not well known definitely) actress in india. I still vote for 'keep'. further feel free to ping for any queries. please read list of sources in article WP:ICTFSOURCES. Krishna Murthy DL (talk) 11:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Sock puppet comment struck. --bonadea contributions talk 15:58, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a vote, and please do not post more than one bolded opinion. I realise that you are a very new editor, and as such it is easy to misinterpret the many pages of guidelines and policies that exist. Press releases, such as reference 2, do not count towards notability since they are not independent. And it goes without saying that a piece called "Nazar actress Sonyaa is a siren in real life; a look at her sultry pictures" (reference 3) is not going to be useful. If you take a moment to look at it, you will see that it is just a bunch of pictures from the actor's own Instagram account, with empty blurbs written for the clickbait value – in other words, it is not close to being a reliable source, and contains no information that is relevant for the article. I'll make a summary table for the sources tonight if I have the time, to show more clearly why none of them counts towards GNG. Please do not ping me. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 11:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for misinterpret your thoughts about me.... I'd only say one thing... as mentioned in WP:ICTFSOURCES sources are valid and article dosent look doing any promotions. I have never edited this article as was not aware it was in exist, now ill definitely take efforts to find more sources and information in neutral pov for contribution. About pictures I suggest one can nominate it for deletion instead of article if it dosent fits in criteria. Anyways this is my last communication on this afd I'd again say I vote to 'Keep' this article, as it has notability as per GNG or else 'they would have not approved it in AFC (This was created through AFC kindly check.) Thanks Krishna Murthy DL (talk) 12:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Sock puppet comment struck. --bonadea contributions talk 15:58, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was never submitted to AfC, and not approved by an AfC reviewer. The account that moved the draft to mainspace was used by the same user who created the draft, and both accounts have since been blocked for using multiple accounts deceptively. I apologise for calling you a new editor – that was based on your displaying a "Novice editor" badge on your user page as well as on the fact that you started editing English Wikipedia a week ago, but if you say that it is a misinterpretation, I stand corrected. --bonadea contributions talk 12:29, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:53, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep Reliable sources are present for this known television actress. इं. हेमंत बोरकर (talk) 14:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Sock puppet comment struck. --bonadea contributions talk 15:58, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Krishna Murthy DL and ErHemantBorkar (who signed themself इं. हेमंत बोरकर) have been blocked as socks of the same LTA sockmaster. I have struck their comments. --bonadea contributions talk 15:58, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG as of now upcoming at best a case of WP:TOOSOON.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:31, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Case of [{WP:TOOSOON]]. Fails WP:NACTOR. scope_creep^Talk 17:29, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.