Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic Generations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) Jarkeld (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sonic Generations[edit]
- Sonic Generations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- Edit: Also, listing Sonic (2011 video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BALL. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Sonic Generations for a more elaborate rationale. Basically, enough here is speculation, including the name, to warrant listing. All that is known is there will be a game celebrating Sonic's 20th Anniversary. So the appropriate section on Sonic the Hedgehog (series) can hold such information. « ₣M₣ » 03:26, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - There is no announcement of a game titled as this. It's purely WP:OR, assigning an untitled trailer to recently registered website domain or trademark or something. Sergecross73 msg me 03:09, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Sonic (2011 video game) - This article is about the same trailer, assigning another title to it that is purely WP:OR. It should be deleted on the same grounds. Sergecross73 msg me 03:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both as per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER, with no prejudice to recreation as and when significant coverage in reliable sources appears. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 14:44, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It was even worse when I first came across the article. An editor tried to use a forum post from a fansite, that contained a picture of "Sonic 20th Anniversary Wii-Mote holder" as proof of a Wii version of the game. So many things wrong with that. Sergecross73 msg me 18:40, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong, overriding keep IGN is now covering this. The article is a stub. http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/articles/116/1162323p1.html 86.148.51.62 (talk) 16:34, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As supported by this link - http://blogs.sega.com/usa/2011/04/18/celebrate-20-years-of-sonic-with-sonic-generations/ 81.135.63.55 (talk) 17:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I originally voted to delete both articles, but now more information about the game has been officially revealed, including the actual title, this particular article shouldn't be deleted. -wANINOKOZ ♪♫♪ 18:08, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Now that the game's been officially announced and supporting information has surfaced, there's absolutely no reason why the article should be considered for deletion. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 18:20, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note I have deleted Sonic (2011 video game) per WP:CSD#A10 as it is virtually the exact same article as Sonic Generations sans the image. –MuZemike 22:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - Just enough to be a split article. It would be best to gather more sources and try and make some more content, just to validate that it needs its own article. Blake (Talk·Edits) 19:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep - No point deleting it since it has been confirmed to exist, and more information has been confirmed to be coming in the next few weeks/months. Evilgidgit (talk) 19:19, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep It's a real game seen here as reported by IGN, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV1Osnkr5Nc&feature=feedu ScienceApe (talk) 19:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Time for a speedy close yes? Speedy as in... now? ScienceApe (talk) 19:50, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[1] « ₣M₣ » 20:23, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.