Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonia Sharma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sonia Sharma[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Moved after being declined at AFC to main namespace

The references all fail WP:RS. The actress obviously has a fanbase, but this is just fancruft. She may have an article when her career allows it. WP:TOOSOON Fiddle Faddle 14:04, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 14:04, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 14:04, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Google Translate says that Sonia Sharma is a transliteration of सोनिया शर्मा in Devanagari script, and I can't find reliable sources from either spelling online. All of the roles listed in the article (mostly unsourced) appear to have been minor per WP:NACTOR. Captain Calm (talk) 14:25, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note Please see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sonia Sharma (2) where there is another identical or near identical version queue up behind this one Fiddle Faddle 16:18, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - If the actress has a fanbase, that is a form of notability. This article does appear to be fancruft, but a better article can be developed. The best approach may be soft deletion to allow a neutral editor, or a fan who is familiar with what a Wikipedia article is, to write the article. The article shows at most one significant role, not multiple roles. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.