Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonia Noemí (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:00, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sonia Noemí[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, no significant coverage in reliable sources, nothing found via Google. Huon (talk) 23:15, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom, fails WP:GNG LADY LOTUS • TALK 03:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. She seems to be a pretty big deal in Puerto Rico for the 1960's era. Article just lacks proper sourcing which is a content issue not cause enough for a deletion. Here are several reliable sources:

El Nuevo Día: [1]
MPRnoticias: [2]
National Foundation for Popular Culture: [3]
Primera Hora: [4]
RTVE: [5] [6]
WKAQ-TV: [7]
IMDb: [8]
Amazon: [9][10]
Rotten Tomatoes: [11]

—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 13:44, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IMBd - not a reliable source, Rotten Tomatoes - mere mention of work, same with Amazon. LADY LOTUS • TALK 18:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Meets WP:BASIC per [12], [13]. It's likely that more Spanish-language sources are available that cover the subject. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:10, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Agreed that Rotten Tomatoes and IMDB are not reliable sources. But El Nuevo Día and Primera Hora certainly are. -- Whpq (talk) 13:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

El Nuevo Día article is about her book more than her. And Primera Hora is again more about her book than her, it does talk about her son but by these sources you could make an article about her book more than keep hers. LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting coverage for your book, as an author, would establish notability so I see nothing wrong with the two sources above. I have zero proficiency in Spanish so looking for sources would be a laborious task for me. but in any case, I also dug up [14] which is from 2011 and has nothing to do with the book. -- Whpq (talk) 15:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.