Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Song destinations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and then redirect to Song (airline)#Destinations. JERRY ^talk _contribs 01:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Song destinations[edit]

I'm nominating this one procedurally after the creator questioned a similar prod I put on another page on the basis that we had other destination lists for other airlines. I did some research and found out there is actually a precedent for keeping such lists (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Airlines destinations). The question I'd like a consensus on here is whether this precedent extends to now-defunct airlines. I'm leaning towards delete myself on the basis that all information is currently on the article Song (airline). Redfarmer (talk) 00:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Song (airline). I initially prodded this article, but had second thoughts. Anyway, this is information that can very well be integrated into the main article, but not worthy of a separate article. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 01:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 09:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Song (airline). I agree with what has been said. Also, that page totally abused bullets and those tiny flag icons. ― LADY GALAXY 16:00, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The information is already in Song (airline), so merge is unnecessary. Emeraude (talk) 16:08, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think the merge votes (correct me if I'm wrong) really mean Redirect this particular search term to the specific section of the already existing article, namely Song (airline)#Destinations. So, delete with a redirect for me. Keeper | 76 18:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.