Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somnio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Somnio[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems like a pretty ordinary advertising agency which has achieved only local recognition and non-notable honors ("one of the 50 fastest growing agencies in Austin"?). NawlinWiki (talk) 18:03, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 18:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The listed accomplishments do not appear notable in themselves: a combination of local, associated-supplier, and up-and-coming long-lists. We're left with 12th largest firm of its type in its city and I am not seing WP:RS coverage going beyond that. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 09:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero results in Adweek and PRWeek. Not sure how large it is in terms of employees or revenues. Current page is an advert. CorporateM (Talk) 01:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.