Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Something About Your Smile
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Star In the Hood. (non-admin closure) [Belinrahs|talktome⁄ ididit] 17:56, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Something About Your Smile[edit]
- Something About Your Smile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not very notable. Page has no context at all, single referance, subject doesn't need it's own article Alan - talk 23:35, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 01:42, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect -- As per WP:NSONG: "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." This article will unlikely ever grow beyond a stub. Therefore, a redirect is more appropriate, despite issues regarding notability. Singularity42 (talk) 02:00, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Redirect per above. All I can find are a few brief mentions of the song, the "best" probably being [1][2][3]. I don't really feel these can be considered "non-trivial" such that they meet the "significant coverage" standard required to pass WP:NSONGS. Gongshow Talk 05:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as appropriateness of a separate article not demonstrated, in particular due to the low chart position achieved. Adambro (talk) 12:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - as there isn't the coverage needde to establish this single song as notable -- Whpq (talk) 16:07, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.