Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soma Snakeoil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete - G12 by Graeme Bartlett (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 16:00, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Soma Snakeoil[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:BIO and WP:ENTERTAINER. ttonyb (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as promotional copyvio. Most of the article is cut-and-pasted from these two advertising sites [1] [2] or their equivalents; there'z active spamming going on. The paragraph I haven't tracked down reads like cut-and-paste advertising, too. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have deleted this as a copyvio, promotion could have been edited out, but probably not worth the effort! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.