Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solveig Argeseanu Cunningham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Solveig Argeseanu Cunningham[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Solveig Argeseanu Cunningham does not satisfy the requirements of WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, or WP:NPROF. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing found for this person; article reads like a likedin post. Associate professor is a long way from notability. Oaktree b (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

People are so quick to say "nothing found". Here's an entire NY Times article[1] about the 2014 article in the New England Journal of Medicine of which she's the first author.[2] She's not a slam dunk for notability, but it's also far from "nothing". Jahaza (talk) 03:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't find the NYT article and it's paywalled, I stand by my statement. Oaktree b (talk) 13:54, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Associate profs are nothing to be overlooked. Give me an associate professor from Harvard or MIT over one from an Alaskan Community College. BostonMensa (talk) 18:35, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, Health and fitness, and Georgia (U.S. state). Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The Google Scholar page on her at https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=3qiScrMAAAAJ&hl=en shows an impressive citation count and h-index. I think together they establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:30, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm not entirely persuaded by the citation statistics alone, since she's not a top author on three of the four Lancet articles that are supercharging her citation count, but I think there's enough here (see my comment above with a NY Times article). Jahaza (talk) 03:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Eastmain and Jahaza's decisions. CastJared (talk) 03:27, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - even ignoring the Lancet articles, her work is highly cited both by the academic literature and in the popular press. Her 2014 paper on childhood obesity generated multiple news stories, as did her work on doctors' strikes, and a 2022 article on increases in childhood obesity. DaffodilOcean (talk) 10:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. The person who loves reading (talk) 00:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.