Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solution chain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 15:33, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Solution chain[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not establish notability for this term. I assume it is a neologism based on this. ~Kvng (talk) 22:48, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Restored per Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion § Solution chain Wbm1058 (talk) 16:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is just a WP:weasel article. The ambiguous term "solution chain" could just as easily be applicable to math or science as to business. Wbm1058 (talk) 16:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of quality. Managerial buzzword bingo without an indication of how its content would relate to the real world. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 19:19, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Multiple searches found no results for this specific term. SwisterTwister talk 05:43, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.