Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solomon Joseph
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Solomon Joseph[edit]
- Solomon Joseph (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:N. Article of a non-notable journalist. Coundnt find any reliable references. Keep only if anyone can provide them -- Tinu Cherian - 06:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —-- Tinu Cherian - 06:02, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —-- Tinu Cherian - 05:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete : per nom -- Tinu Cherian - 16:30, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete :Mmm, a google search only seems to show of a British painter (1860-1921). It lacks decent sources and doesn't really assert his importance as a writer other than he had some publications in local newspapers. "Famous" is not a word I'd use and it is full of peacock words and POV. If more reliable sources could be found and the importance can be properly asserted then I'd support it, but by the looks of it seems a clear delete. The Bald One White cat 22:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The peacock words and POV can be edited. This article has been written by me who has no experience of wikipedia and how to get references and from where. It will take time to collect the references. But none of the article is false. Solomon Joseph was famous for his social work among Malayalees in Bombay and his writings became controversial after his 1980 article on the connection between Mata Amritanandamayi and the thorium deposits in Kerala's soil. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mthomasin (talk • contribs) 04:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
keep Well this is one reference that I could get hold of regarding Solomon Joseph... http://www.sunnynewsonline.com/aboutus.html Will have to search for more references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mthomasin (talk • contribs) 05:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments : Mthomasin, We need third party references regarding the notability and verifibility of this subject's notability.sunnynews is directly related to Solomon and cannot be treated as RS. If the subject is really notable, reliable and third party references should be easily accessible. Besides there is a strong COI with Solomon with the only contributor of the article. -- Tinu Cherian - 08:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments Thanks Tinu...there are newspaper articles about Solomon Joseph's notability and verifiability in reputed main stream newspapers like the Times of India, Indian Express, Free Press journal etc. I will need some time to get some of these references and post them online. Thanks and regards...mathew--Mthomasin (talk) 17:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments: Please note that AFD are usually open for a week -- Tinu Cherian - 17:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete : Per WP:N --Tux the penguin (talk) 14:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete since none of the sourced content in the article establishes notability. If Mthomasin wishes, it can be userified for few weeks, till appropriate sources are found that justify recreation. Abecedare (talk) 20:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.