Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solo Riq

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:58, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Solo Riq[edit]

Solo Riq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable rapper, no reliable source in the page, no indication that any could be found. On 4 May I moved this to draft space, where it was declined by two AfC reviewers; the WP:SPA still seems to think it belongs in mainspace. A7 has been declined three times (twice by me), bringing it here seems to be the only remaining option. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:34, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've restored Draft:Solo Riq and redirected it here, as histmerge didn't seem to be a possibility (the second AfC decline was after the copy-paste move to mainspace); the earlier history of the page can be seen there. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 12:45, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 12:45, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 12:45, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 12:45, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete very clearly a creation by an SPA who seems to try to establish notability through a Wikipedia article as opposed creating an article about someone who is notable. There are no sources that can be identified to support notability. Statements in the article are poorly sourced (primary/unreliable) - due to lack of independent sourcing. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 12:45, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete A7 – I explained in great detail why the subject is not notable in my talk page conversation to the creator. This is A7 worthy as this rapper is literally completely unknown. There is zero coverage in reliable sources or any non primary sources for that matter. StaticVapor message me! 20:56, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The author is very desperate to save this article, he has been begging on my talk page. Regardless, I believe that the rapper is not notable. --BoothSift 03:54, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unknown person.PE65000 (talk) 11:16, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: non notable musician Ceethekreator (talk) 13:57, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete preferably speedily as there's no evidence of significance or notability and then salt it because it'll almost certainly be recreated. Praxidicae (talk) 13:37, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.