Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solas nua
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Courcelles 00:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Solas nua[edit]
- Solas nua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet the GNG. Also significant conflict of interest with creator listed as "social media manager" on given external link - the tone is bad. Raymie (t • c) 06:32, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I have given the article a serious going-over and removed 90% of the puffery that was there, together with adding links and corrections. What is left is brief but I would consider this an established and notable arts organisation - there are quite a number of hits on an internet search. asnac (talk) 08:21, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Significant coverage in WaPo, productions reviewed in NYT, won DC Mayor's Arts Award 86.44.35.99 (talk) 23:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Added links to profiles by The Irish Times & NPR 86.44.35.99 (talk) 23:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Meets WP:GNG on the basis of the Irish Times and NPR coverage. Qrsdogg (talk) 16:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.