Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar power in Azerbaijan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Solar power in Azerbaijan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is only one solar plant of note in Azerbaijan per RS[1]. An entire article devoted to "solar power in Azerbaijan" gives outsized importance to the subject and may mislead readers that this petrostate is a major producer of renewable energy. If there is any content worth keeping, it can be merged with Renewable energy in Azerbaijan. Thenightaway (talk) 00:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Economics, Environment, and Azerbaijan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:23, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-notable subject, author likely a COI SPA, part of a massive flooding of recent Azerbaijan related articles, most now in AfD. Owen× ☎ 00:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Turkishturan Can you tell us whether you have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest please. If you do not have a COI do you think this article should be kept and if so why? Chidgk1 (talk) 19:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Actually, there are several solar power plants in Azerbaijan right now, for example in Pirallahi. The names of the solar plants are true and can be tranfered to "Renewable energy in Azerbaijan" article. But the subject itself fails WP:GNG and almost the entire article is about "solar radiation in Azerbaijan". --Surə ^🗯 18:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have excerpted to that article Chidgk1 (talk) 20:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I understand your point but if we delete it now we will only have to recreate it again in a couple of years time. I have no conflict of interest and am willing to improve the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thenightaway If you nominate articles for deletion often please consider using Wikipedia:Twinkle as that should automatically notify the creator of the article Chidgk1 (talk) 19:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I both agree that it's doomed to be a stub for a while until Azerbaijan does more with solar, but it's also likely that they will eventually. Although I would guess ten years and not two years. Keeping or deleting depends on if preemptive creates like these are setting a good example or a bad example.

Wizmut (talk) 05:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)'[reply]

Delete. If we have to recreate the article in the future, so be it; it isn't encyclopedically relevant now, and as Sura points out, it's better handled on Renewable energy in Azerbaijan. -- asilvering (talk) 07:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.