Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar eclipse of July 19, 1917

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of solar eclipses in the 20th century. (non-admin closure) Aszx5000 (talk) 22:59, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Solar eclipse of July 19, 1917[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

FAIL GNG. This time it happened in a small area near Antarctica, and it was unlikely that anyone saw him at the time, so he violated gng and should reordered. Q 𝟤 𝟪 23:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Q 𝟤 𝟪 23:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If anything, redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 20th century where the relevant information is already stored. Primefac (talk) 19:59, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. I agree with mom that this fails GNG. There is only one ref, with questionable reliability. Might as well redirect to another relevant page. I would also be fine with deleting, although I think redirecting is probably a better option. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 00:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 20th century as a WP:ATD: general consensus is that future eclipses that do not meet WP:GNG/WP:NASTRO like this one should be redirected. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:55, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 20th century. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 19:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, seems the best option. Cinadon36 09:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 20th century.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:22, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.