Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soju philip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:46, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soju philip[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources provided for notability. Creator added some sort of reference that I have no way of checking as it is not well-formatted or a publication I am familiar with in response to an earlier WP:PRODBLP. Zero hits on Google News, no other specific reason to believe he's notable. I'm also guessing WP:SELFPROMOTION as this is the only article the creator has edited. 0x0077BE [^talk/_contrib] 15:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC) 0x0077BE [^talk/_contrib] 15:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. He is a popular chef worked in different 5-star hotels. That is not sufficient for notability. Salih (talk) 05:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - yeah, nothing I could find would allow the subject to meet WP:GNG. Stalwart111 07:01, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Source searches are not providing significant coverage in reliable sources. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:09, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Major lack of sources and fails WP:GNG Ducknish (talk) 01:25, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.