Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofía Petro (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sofía Petro[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable activist. Being the daughter of Gustavo Petro, the president of Colombia, does not make her notable as it is not inherited per se. I'm also unconvinced by the keep votes in the previous AFD and the article has not improved much since that nomination. It seems pretty obvious to me she is not a notable activist, and she has gained some coverage only for being the daughter of Petro. An article on the Petro family could be created and this, redirected there. Bedivere (talk) 02:56, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. Some Spanish sources were found in the previous AfD for this article [1] [2][3][4]. There are some other sources online that are debatable, but I think these sources are just enough to get it over WP:GNG. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 05:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did review those sources and I am unconvinced about Petro's individual notability. Although these do cover her, her notability is inherited from that of her father. She is not notable on her own. She may be notable later, but she definitely is not now. Bedivere (talk) 14:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Colombia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:29, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep On the strength of the CNN source in particular. Additionally, there are tags for coverage of her on major Colombian news sites – some of the individual articles are trivial, but cumulatively it speaks to notability as well. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 16:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Was going to close, but wasn't sure the consensus was clear enough so thought I'd do some reading and participate directly. Between the CNN source and the others above, I think notability is fairly clear. Sure, she's getting the coverage because of her father, but that doesn't mean that the notability is being inherited - notability doesn't really care whether the sourcing should exist or not, just that it does. Nosebagbear (talk) 00:58, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.