Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SocioNihilism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete due to verifiability and notability problems. Davewild (talk) 18:02, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SocioNihilism[edit]

After a lengthy search, I could find no information in reliable sources to verify the content of this article. Unless such information is forthcoming, I think the article should be deleted, as we have no reason to believe it is accurate. The article has WP:PROBLEMS related to original research etc., but obviously these are irrelevant to the deletion debate. Skomorokh 13:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very interesting, but not notable. Zazaban (talk) 17:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not redeemable. Even if this is real, this is not how you create an article. Sources come first and then content. This article does nothing to attribute socionihilism. If it was something real, it would point to personalities or publications upon which the term is founded. -Verdatum (talk) 18:40, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.