Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society of Gilders
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 01:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Society of Gilders[edit]
- Society of Gilders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Searches found nothing better and there's still nothing actually convincing for its own notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Here is an additional reliable source that can be added to the article. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - In it's present state, it looks like it has serious copyvio problems, according to Earwig's Copyvio Detector, 2/3 of this article is copied/pasted from their website - Society of Gilders (about), specifically the "Mission" and "History" sections, and if you compare the text in the lead to their home page, it gets even worse.-- Isaidnoway (talk) 16:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:29, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:29, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 16:51, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 16:51, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.