Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social injustice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Social injustice[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Superfluous: it's just the inverse of social justice. The content is of no utility, and reminds me of a student faking it when they haven't really studied the subject they are supposed to be writing an essay about. Orange Mike | Talk 01:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable enough to warrant an article of its own when it is just an inversion on social justice. Kierzek (talk) 02:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/Redirect to social justice. While the mere fact that it's the opposite or inverse of another topic/article doesn't necessarily mean it's redundant, in this case it certainly seems to be. The only sentence which suggests the possibility of a separate subject is "Social injustice is used as a slogan by certain societies to oppose other societies' definition of social justice", but even insofar as that could be treated as a distinct subject (a stretch), it would still best be covered in the social justice article. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per OrangeMike.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 20:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unreferenced, and ORish. All can be discussed in social justice, per Mike. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.