Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Programming Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:38, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Social Programming Network[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was accepted at AfC , but I see no real indication of significance, and no references showing notability. DGG ( talk ) 21:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC) DGG ( talk ) 21:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Alot of WP:B2B talk which reads as alot of 'we will', 'we have', 'this will happen' and a whole lot of buzzspeak designed to get easy Google hits. Not much notable to be found on them. Nate • (chatter) 00:52, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage. Article about a startup raising capital is just run of teh mill busines news reporting. -- Whpq (talk) 13:49, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Whpq. I could not find any coverage at all about this company, or investment group, or whatever it is. (I read the article three times and I still don't understand what it does.) --MelanieN (talk) 03:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no coverage outside of a Business week press release, no real indication of importance, borderline CSD A7 if I'm honest. It seems to be a trait of non notable startups trumpeting loudly about their latest investment round, which doesn't mean anything, as all startups, or at least the ones that don't go out of business, do this. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.