Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Empires

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:GAMEGUIDE. Bishonen | talk 11:43, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Social Empires[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable game - fails WP:GNG. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 14:37, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom (I just PRODed it, as WP:GAMEGUIDE applies). — O Fortuna!^{Imperatrix mundi.} 14:52, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

At least one review here; it looks like a few of the others are passing mentions. There's an interesting article about trends in Facebook games it looks like. --Izno (talk) 11:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Exemplo347 (talk) 01:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I'm tempted to vote "Delete" just on the WP: TNT principle, because the article as stands really is little more than a poorly written game guide. However, a brief search turned up two articles ([1], [2]) which strongly imply that the game is notable. I think we have enough here to throw together a passable article. I may get to work on that myself in a day or two (but don't hold me to it).--Martin IIIa (talk) 16:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per TNT; can be recreated if Martin IIIa or others do get around to writing an actual article, but currently it's only a poor game guide. Sandstein 11:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.