Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sneha Krunal Thakker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sneha Krunal Thakker[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another BLP created by paid editor G2003. As usual with him, the references are superficially impressive but on closer examination are extremely sketchy. There are two interviews with the subject and possibly one real independent source (this one: [1], whose reliability I am unsure of.) Most of the references appear to be passing mentions, non-mentions, or non-existent. Sammy1339 (talk) 03:48, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:32, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A page with marketing intentions. We can find lakhs of SSE Entrepreneurs in India and its not wikipedia's objective to dedicate an article for them without significant achievement or notability. I couldn't find any notable achievement by this lady other than the CEO of a small software firm. Athachil (talk) 13:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete as self-promotional. Very minor awards, not enough for WP:N. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
keep I can see the verified news channel and news paper media coverage along with awards received. There certainly can be lakhs of entrepreneur in Inida, but not all of them are able to achieve the milestones she has shown in the article that too being a lady. We may need to change the way the achievement represented. I firmly don't believe its self promotion. Vikmi (talk) 14:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC) — Vikmi (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep: In a search, I found few sources not included in the article and I have added them. One is an interview with DNA news paper for her selection to Google and her app KnockDoc. The second one is with Economic times news paper, being 10 finalists of Inida to be selected by Google to be voice of woman in technology. The third is about her creation of the mobile app to find doctors from anywhere by Divya Bhaskar News paper. Fourth was the GSTV news channel coverage again for the same mobile app. Fifth was her interview to inspire woman entrepreneurs by Youth Inc Magazine. These are substantive claims that show notability, per WP:BIO and WP:N. --IMDJ2 (talk) 15:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC) — IMDJ2 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

@IMDJ2: Can you please post the links to these references here? --Sammy1339 (talk) 16:54, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Sammy1339: You should have checked it in the article itself! Here they are [2][3][4][5][6] --IMDJ2 (talk) 18:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not particularly notable. Come back later when there is better media coverage. --Adam in MO Talk 07:23, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails biographies of living people and notability even it seems to be self-promotional article. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 08:24, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.