Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snakes and Lattes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was 'Nomination withdrawn'

Snakes and Lattes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CORP. suspect advert as created by single edit user. Coverage is all routine. LibStar (talk) 06:48, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 07:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 07:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 07:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 07:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Single edit user or no, there's actually a lot of coverage here - there's quite a few reliable sources beyond those already in the article - lengthy mentions in major sources like the Toronto Star. I'll probably add a few when I have more time. Nwlaw63 (talk) 14:42, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There is substantial coverage in reliable sources, which are cited on the page, as well as additional sources available online, for example: [1] and [2]. Meets WP:CORP and WP:GNG. None of that coverage is routine for a cafe. mikeman67 (talk) 15:20, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Added the above sources. I'll do more when I have the time. Nwlaw63 (talk) 00:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Kudos to Nwlaw63 for the recent Quality improvement efforts to the page. — Cirt (talk) 17:19, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.