Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smrithi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 00:49, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Smrithi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is one of a series of articles created by editors/socks with direct conflict of interest, who also apparently run some movie and music PR websites; see ANI report. This article cites no independent reliable source, and given that it was created by editors involved with the movie, I don't believe any such source exists. Article therefore fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Abecedare (talk) 15:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Abecedare (talk) 15:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Abecedare (talk) 15:43, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per nomination and WP:GNG. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 15:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alts:

type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

producer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Sorry, but the nominators' empty statement "I don't believe any such source exists" is meaningless when due diligence find the topic is sourcable... however, what is a pertinent issue is that it simply does not have enough available to meet WP:GNG or WP:NF. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 12:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.