Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smooky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete by Anthony.bradbury as G1. Non-admin close--CastAStone /^{/₵₳$↑₳}^{₴₮ʘ№€} 23:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smooky[edit]

Non-notable neoglism, pure dictionary definition. Sourced (improperly) through Wiktionary. Propose delete under WP:NOT#DICT. Redfarmer (talk) 21:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete, could speedy as patent nonsense in my opinion. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete under WP:NOT#DICT per Redfarmer. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 21:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete under WP:NOT#DICT and I added a orphan tag on it, along with a missing lead section tag. Ohmpandya (Talk) 22:04, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete junk. JuJube (talk) 22:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per WP:NOT#DICT and WP:MADEUP. This is just a duplicate of the Wiktionary entry. —Travis ^talk 22:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Fails WP:NOT. Perfect Proposal ^{Speak Out!} 22:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that WP:NOT (including #DICT) is not a criteria for speedy deletion. —Travis ^talk 22:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.