Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smondo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 00:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Smondo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable WP:NEOLOGISM. Appears to be confined to a single development in Bangalore. No evidence of use elsewhere. noq (talk) 07:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't seem like the word has caught on yet, no Google News hits. The concept makes sense however. Northwestgnome (talk) 08:03, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not caught on yet since it's a new concept. Will update with some resources once there is some press coverage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbazg1 (talk • contribs) 08:50, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As by your own admission it has not caught on yet it does not qualify for an article - If it does catch on, that might change in the future. noq (talk) 13:33, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per the creator. Joe Chill (talk) 20:38, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it's a shame because without an authoritative definition the term could be misused, but until that press coverage turns up there's really no alternative. Declan Clam (talk) 01:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.