Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartEiffel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn‎. (non-admin closure) — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SmartEiffel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources that establish notability. Skyerise (talk) 14:37, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is notability?

Why is notability the criteria? May I not delete you, as you are not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.82.251 (talk) 14:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General notability on Wikipedia is in-depth coverage in at least two independent sources. Sources affiliated with the product or project do not count toward establishing notability. Skyerise (talk) 14:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I ask is because the project clearly meets the criteria of notability. Anyone who understands the topic addressed in the article would agree. It is easy to establish, by examining any of the links which had been presented in the page at time of your spurious and harmful deletion request. Here is a quote from the README included in the source code of the project. since the very first public release in September 1995, SmartEiffel has been used worldwide by increasingly numerous individuals and Universities. Are you insisting that this is incorrect? Or that it is not sufficient to meet the criteria you require?

That is not an independent source. We want coverage in books, academic journals, or reviews. Skyerise (talk) 15:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Computing. — Karnataka ^talk 14:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and France. — Karnataka ^talk 14:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn - sufficient sources have been found detailing significant implementation features, though the IP editor has so far ignored them while trying to source to blogspot. Skyerise (talk) 17:16, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.