Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small loom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Small loom[edit]

Basically, all it says is that "a small loom is a loom that is small." Manufacturers etc. distinguish between floor and table looms, but other than that, size is very specifically how wide a cloth can be woven. Mangoe (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I would suggest merging it with loom, but, in this instance, it doesn't appear that there would be much here that it would be worthwhile to add to that article. Anaxial (talk) 23:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to loom as possible search term, and redirects are cheap. No content worth merging. -Atmoz (talk) 17:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then we should put in large loom too? I'd rather avoid any suggestion that there is some distinct class of "small looms", when there isn't. Mangoe (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - but no objection to redirecting to loom (If people think that this is a likely search term... if not just delete). Blueboar (talk) 18:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 04:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since it doesn't really have any useful content at all, nothing to merge. No objection to a redirect. Hut 8.5 12:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article does not provide any specific definition of the subject. How big is a loom that is classified as small? What is the definition of small with regard to looms? The only hint to the definition is that the article states that a small loom is designed to be portable. If that is the definition of a small loom, the article should be titled "portable loom" and then discuss the features of portable looms vs. nonportable looms. As it stands, this article provides no useful information, and also is completely unreferenced. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 20:45, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.