Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small Planet Airlines (Cambodia)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Small Planet Airlines. History is preserved should folks wish to enact a merger Star Mississippi 01:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Small Planet Airlines (Cambodia)[edit]

Small Planet Airlines (Cambodia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creepTalk 18:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Small Planet Airlines as a premature WP:SPINOFF, where the content cannot be safely merged. This is another example of how excessive fragmentation harms the upkeep and access to information, resulting in a bad user experience. I would like to widen the debate and also suggest the following:
Small Planet Airlines (disambiguation) – delete
Small Planet Airlines (Germany) – redirect to Small Planet Airlines
Small Planet Airlines (Italy) – redirect to Small Planet Airlines
Small Planet Airlines (Poland) – redirect to Small Planet Airlines
The Italy and Cambodia operations were tiny. Just two airplanes. Poland and Germany were somewhat larger yet also these articles remained underdeveloped. The airlines shared one ownership and name. After concentrating on one article, hopefully, more information we will be brought to the parent, and its text will be improved. That's an urgent need as some of the text implies 6 years later that the company is still active and the undisclosed paid warning doesn't help build trust either. gidonb (talk) 07:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gidonb: I never saw them. Kudos for finding them. scope_creepTalk 19:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, also for concentrating on unnecessary SPINOFFs! Excessive SPINOFFs make information management a pain and the user experience hellish! gidonb (talk) 10:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Its nothing something I've thought about but will in the future. I think it is really important. scope_creepTalk 12:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please do. Also these have great options for ATDs: merge and redirect. gidonb (talk) 12:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.