Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slumber Party Slaughter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slumber Party Slaughter[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film, no coverage in reliable sources, does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NFILM. It won an award at a non-notable film festival; the citation supporting this is improperly formatted and just goes to the homepage for that film festival, but digging through the website leads me to this, which should rest any doubts of the award's notability. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:05, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete copyvio, added G12, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 17:14, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - don't really care one way or another if it's deleted. I just simply re-wrote the plot to take care of the copy-vio issue. The diffs where the copy-vio originated can be rev/del. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 16:49, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks its clean now, still needs revdel but am not seeing any reviews or much rs coverage apart from Film Affinity- am neutral now Atlantic306 (talk) 23:54, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, there are no critic reviews for this film on metacritic so i think it didn't make any mainstream newspaper, there are some refs and a long cast list but most of the refs are describing winning awards of little importance or similar fair. Szzuk (talk) 18:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 05:32, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - I do see the argument that it may be non-notable, but it looks like it stars some notable actors like Carradine. Article probably just needs to be less promotional. Skirts89 (talk) 19:59, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that the involvement of notable actors does not make the film itself notable. At the very least, WP:NFILM makes no mention of inheriting notability from actors in its list of inclusionary criteria. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:34, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 16:20, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete as per nominator. I wouldn't bother to comment, because the other commenters have already covered the topic well enough, but seeing as the discussion has been relisted multiple times, my opinion is: although it has some references, it seams to be absolutely a WP:ROTM slasher film that didn't have any real impact in the genre. --Slashme (talk) 14:49, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.