Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SloTop50

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SloTop50[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A self-published chart, which does not contain any third party notability, nor does it contain any concrete methodology. I tried to search somewhere reliable where SloTop50 is mentioned, turns out that even the IFPI does not recognize it. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 05:29, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Before declaring my preference I'd like to point out there are five lists of SloTop50 singles from years 2013-2017 plus a template (below). Should these be including in this debate as well? Ajf773 (talk) 10:05, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 04:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The methodology is clear for me, as it is an airplay chart, it just counts all the songs played on the monitored radio stations. Having the SAZAS backing the chart is more than many charts here on en-WP are able to. And I found some reception of the chart, but only domestic newspapers. It doesn't look like the chart is well-known outside of the country... [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]

My proposal: keep the chart, but move it to Slo Top 50 as this one is more recognized, as is seems. --Ali1610 (talk) 12:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:52, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.