Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slim surfing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete (G1) by Jaranda. Non-admin closure. Blueboy 96 22:08, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slim surfing[edit]

Non-notable neologism. -- RHaworth 14:25, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy Delete~~Strong Delete It's not even a neologism. If google only returns 30 hits on an internet term, most of which are irrelevant, the term just doesn't exist. This is gibberish.--Yannick 16:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately there's no speedy criterion that fits. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 17:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I guess Wikipedia:Patent nonsense became more restrictive since I last used it.--Yannick 17:50, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete, obviously made up one day. I really wish that WP:NFT were a speedy criterion... Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 17:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete CSD G1, yes, its patent Rackabello 18:12, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete I tagged an earlier version of this as G11 spam because it looked like an ad for a specific service, and between the link that keeps creeping in and the account name of the editor who created the page I'm thinking there's a WP:COI issue as well. I'm not sure it's nonsense, but that doesn't matter because it's definitely not notable... This article has a little bit of everything wrong with it. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 18:25, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.