Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SlifkerGames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:19, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SlifkerGames[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. The only sources cited are the article subject's official website and Facebook, and I can't find any news articles about the subject whatsoever. Aspening (talk) 00:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:36, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:36, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:36, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the nom. --Izno (talk) 00:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ^Semi_Hypercube ✎ 01:00, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG. Kirbanzo (talk) 01:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 04:07, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTPROMO, maybe borderline G11. Essentially a brochure for a company's apps. — Alpha3031 (t • c) 05:10, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Since nomination, there are now a lot of WP:REFBOMBS, but these seem like mostly routine primary listings or similar. Primary sources are not usable for notability. Worse, there is nothing explaining why this company is noteworthy. The closest thing is the Otronicon award, but that doesn't appear to have been recognized as significant by any reliable, independent sources. Grayfell (talk) 21:26, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero indications of notabilty, reads more like a vanity piece for the CEO. Fails GNG and NCORP, no references can be found. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.