Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slava Ivančević

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:05, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slava Ivančević[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A longevity claim with almost no substance. Basically all the sources say she lived and died, and have no material about her life in any way. This is best handled on the Longevity claims page in a list. WP:NOPAGE. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:03, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NOPAGE applies here. Also, this is a fantasticly improbable claim since even the one person thought to beat er alleged age may have been a fraud [1] Legacypac (talk) 09:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOPAGE and WP:BIO1E. There is no policy that the "oldest x" is notable and the article contains little beyond longevity fancruft like her secret to longevity. This WP:PERMASTUB is not needed. I also agree with Legacypac that greater discretion needs to be used with fantastically improbable age claims like this, and that the Calment fraud allegations mean we ought to rethink even harder including such articles. Newshunter12 (talk) 01:11, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - One of those who were known only for claiming themselves to be oldest or very old. These subjects lack significant coverage especially when we take their extraordinary claims into account. This is similar to other recently nominated articles. Rzvas (talk) 16:43, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.