Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slashdot effect (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep; nomination withdrawn. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 22:15, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Slashdot effect

Fan created "effect" from Slashdot. I personally don't believe it needs its own article. There is ample information (in a non-slashdottish fasion) in Web_traffic#Traffic_overload. The terminology used in this article is mostly fan-created. Kareeser|^Talk! 22:02, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Suggest nom be withdrawn for speedy keep; WP:SNOW Adrian~enwiki (talk) 22:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep: When the history of the internet is written, this will be one of the most phenomenal developments. The link in the nom is red anyway. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 22:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, I heard of the "Slashdot effect" before I knew what Slashdot was. --AySz88^-^ 22:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep this extremely common (186K)[1] phrase. It has a jargon file entry[2], and has been the subject of notable research[3][4][5] Adrian~enwiki (talk) 22:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment — I withdraw my nomination I hadn't realized how widespread it was until I read the talk page. I apologize. Kareeser|^Talk! 22:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

No apology needed. You acted in good faith -- thank you for working to keep Wikipedia tidy. Don't let one oversight stop you! :)

Adrian~enwiki (talk) 22:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.