Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sky Mark Tower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of tallest buildings in Worcester, Massachusetts. j⚛e decker ^talk 14:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sky Mark Tower[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Building that has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. Being the tallest building in a mid-size city does not make it inherently notable. Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:54, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

By deleting this page we would remove #1 from the List of tallest buildings in Worcester, Massachusetts which would make the existence of the list a bit illogical. What about redirect and merge Sky Mark Tower to List of tallest buildings in Worcester, Massachusetts? To me, it looks like a sensible solution. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 07:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:56, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of tallest buildings in Worcester, Massachusetts. Source searches are providing many mentions, but not finding significant coverage about this building. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:10, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Redirect seems like the right outcome. VMS Mosaic (talk) 07:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A300 foot buildign in an american city is not worth working on here. . DGG ( talk ) 08:15, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.