Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sky Lopez (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sky Lopez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete.: This page voted "keep" a decade ago, but today, Sky is no longer a notable pornstar. She fails to satisfy the requirements of WP:Pornbio. She has no major award wins, no Hall of fame inductions, no unique contributions to pornography, and no mainstream popularity. Redban (talk) 20:08, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wasn't really notable in 2005 either. Fails PORNBIO with only a scene-related award nomination. Lacks significant coverage by reliable sources to pass GNG. All coverage comes from a sex tape story involving a mainstream actor. • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, subject was nominated for a AVN in 2005.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That award was for "Best All-Girl Sex Scene," however. The WP:Pornbio (1) says, "Awards in scene-related and ensemble categories are excluded from consideration." Redban (talk) 22:30, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not only that, nominations are now excluded as well. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 23:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - passes WP:PORNBIO + WP:GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:45, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- How can you possibly claim in good faith that a single nomination for a scene award satisfies PORNBIO? The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:59, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - encyclopedic. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 21:06, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained vote that must have minimal worth in this Afd. Redban (talk) 21:13, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:43, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Gene93k's accurate analysis, soundly based in the applicable guidelines. Per WP:KEEP, "questionable motivations on the part of the nominator do not have a direct bearing on the validity of the nomination", and boilerplate votes with no real policy/guideline basis should be discounted. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 00:50, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete BLPs require better sources then this. FWIW the award is scene related so doesn't count and subtropicalman always votes keep in porn discussions and never offers a policy based reason. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.