Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skonseng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Kimchi.sg 13:08, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Skonseng[edit]

listed as a prod but im contesting. real place and bigger than many we have articles for. why is prod being used on articles that would normally be kept without being questioned? BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 01:09, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per nom. --Fire Star 火星 01:18, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - a town is notable, isn't it? - Richardcavell 01:35, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but desperately needs expansion. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 01:47, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand --Deville (Talk) 02:16, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Its a Norwegian town, no reason to delete. Arbusto 02:36, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as all real places are notable. Carioca 03:22, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but please expand! Heltec talk
Keep, every city, town, estate and even villages are notable. --Ter e nc e Ong 04:09, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. I have expanded it a bit but needs more work. Capitalistroadster 04:35, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a stub for future expansion. Zaxem 05:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm the person who suggested prod. The reason I did was that the original article consisted of "Skonseng is a suburb just north of Mo i Rana. Population: 750" which has no real context or information. Instead of moving my prod to afd, why did you not just remove the prod and add actual details? From where I come from, a city with a population of 750 is not an actual city, but simply a collection of farms which are bounded by an arbirtary taxing region. With no context, I had no way of knowing whether or not this was a real city, or merely Pokemon fan fiction. Fake User 07:10, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it's a real place. JIP | Talk 07:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.