Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sketch tha cataclysm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 06:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sketch tha cataclysm[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources of the subject of this BLP. I do not believe the page meets GNG or MUSICBIO. J04n(talk page) 17:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. J04n(talk page) 17:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. J04n(talk page) 17:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. J04n(talk page) 17:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:38, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:52, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Subject does not appear to be significantly covered in reliable sources, let alone enough to meet WP:BLP. Red Phoenix ^{let's talk...} 01:22, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.