Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skateboard Park Tycoon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. The one delete comes from a reasoning that is obviously applicable anymore. (non-admin closure)‎ Geschichte (talk) 08:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Skateboard Park Tycoon[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game. This article has been un-cited since 2008, and I can't find a single professional review online. Ghosts of Europa (talk) 23:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator: My bad, I didn't realize this already had an AFD discussion so recently. I can't assess the quality of the archived articles since I don't speak the languages, but there's clearly more than I found in my English-language Google search. Ghosts of Europa (talk) 06:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Ghosts of Europa (talk) 23:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I added a bunch of refideas to the talk page when I dePRODDed this back in December - I was able to find several reviews on Archive.org: CD-Action #67 p.92, Secret Service #95 p.61, Xtreme PC #48 p.62, and some short prerelease coverage in Gamelive PC #12 p.39. The game also got two sequels, which similarly have reviews on Archive.org on the talk page that could be used for a 'legacy' section on the article. Waxworker (talk) 01:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as wholly unsourced. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 04:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per WP:NEXIST. Policy is clear that it's about whether a subject is notable, not surmountable problems such as a lack of citations. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You may like to know that I have now edited the article to add the discussed citations. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 07:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.