Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sixth Shopaholic Book

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:56, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sixth Shopaholic Book[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable future book. Does not meet WP:BOOK and Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL. When the book is released and turns out to be notable, the article can be recreated. TParis00ap (talk) 19:23, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Good faith edit, but there isn't even a projected title. Maybe if this book is still in the works and known by this phrase ten years from now, but until then... - BalthCat (talk) 19:29, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:NOTCRYSTAL. May merit a very brief mention in the Sophie Kinsella article if properly sourced. Does not merit a separate article at this stage. Ka renjc 19:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:CRYSTAL. Joe Chill (talk) 19:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While the first five of these books have achieved notability (and a film), an as yet unfinished sixth without even a title (outside the author's notes) does indeed fall under WP:CRYSTAL. When it does come out, I hope the creator of this article will come back and tell us about it. Peridon (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This book hasn't even been named yet, and, to quote the article, "She doesn't mention when it will be released, but probably in 2010". This hardly helps it pass Wp:CRYSTAL. And also leaves me wondering if the Wp:HAMMER can be used here. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 22:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Indeed this does fall under WP:HAMMER, which applies to any medium. If you don't even know the title, you probably don't know enough about it to write an article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Close? - BalthCat (talk) 23:46, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.