Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sito Jaxa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. A merge has been proposed and should proceed once consensus has been determined on the relevant talk page. Eluchil404 (talk) 06:19, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sito Jaxa[edit]

This minor fictional topic has no real world notability asserted Ejfetters 08:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As stated in the article, this character appears in various Star Trek novels as well as one memorable episode. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Even if the subject was not sufficiently notable for its own article, it should have been proposed for merger & redirect to List of Star Trek characters: N-S rather than deletion. (N-S because Sito is the family name.) - Fayenatic (talk) 21:20, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the real-world notability asserted in the article. While it could use a couple more sources, I believe she clearly passes WP:FICT. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 20:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no real world notability in the article, aside from the fact that DS9 writers considered bringing her back and she is in novels. If real-world information exists it just needs to be added to the article. Ejfetters 22:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/Redirect There will be an inevitable section in a list of article if this article gets deleted which would cause GDFL headaches, so it would be better if the article history would be available if a standalone article is not needed at this moment. Agathoclea 22:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article makes no claims to notability, consisting essentially of plot exposition and production trivia (which would better be served in "Hard Time"). — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 22:46, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I agree with {Fayenatic} ZyMOS 06:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - I think its better to merge, I change my mind about delete. Ejfetters 08:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Unlike the case of Ro Laren I agree with you here. I'm not sure what the Italian Wikipedians are thinking in this case. In any event she was only on two episodes and then she died. I'm not sure she classes as more notable than "Minuet" or Picard's nephew.--T. Anthony 12:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I changed my mind too: merge and redirect, same as Robin Lefler who is even more notable in novels. - Fayenatic (talk) 19:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: this character is more memorable from the television series, IMO, than Lefler. --LeyteWolfer 16:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- But memorable is hardly a ground for keeping the article. It asserts no real-world notability. Merge —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ejfetters (talk • contribs) 17:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have to agree. Whether a character is "memorable" only matters if this quality has made it notable. The article gives no indication it's notable on its own. There are many things at "Memory Alpha" that might not belong here. Beta 5 computer, Klaa, Harrad-Sar's ship [1], etc.--T. Anthony (talk) 02:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - This is not a vote decision here, this is a discussion on the article at hand to be deleted, administrators don't simply count votes and make the decision based on that. That said, I think merging is okay to List of Star Trek characters: N-S but if somwhere else, let it be known here, or better yet, just tag that article in question with the merger tag. Ejfetters 18:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.