Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sista Afia (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 23:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sista Afia[edit]

Sista Afia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously nominated for AfD to no avail. Fail of WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. References are primarily promotional and do not constitute proper demonstration for notability Nearlyevil665 (talk) 20:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:53, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:53, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:53, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 01:59, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as passes criteria 8 of WP:NMUSIC (only one criteria needed) with nominations for Ghana's major music awards so deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I found over 60 articles mentioning Sista Afia across the Ghanaian publications Daily Guide, The Herald and The Ghanaian Chronicle available through NewsBank. Whilst many of these have only passing mentions, and some are worthless (e.g. "8 instances Sista Afia's huge breasts have 'confused' social media users", The Herald, 2 February 2021), the overall coverage in these, coupled with other sources, appears to me adequate to meet GNG. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.